en
Optimization and Algorithmic Game Theory
Inaugural symposium organized by TRA Modelling

Optimization and Algorithmic Game Theory

Inaugural Symposium for Prof. László Végh, Hertz Chair at TRA Modelling

April 25, 2025, Lipschitz-Hall (Center for Mathematics)

The newly established Hertz Chair in TRA Modelling focuses on fundamental questions at the intersection of algorithms, optimization, and game theory. The Symposium gives an overview of recent developments in areas such as network design, convex optimization, combinatorial markets and fair division.

We invite all scientists to join! (Please register - see below).

General information, registration and directions

Date: April 25, 2025

Time:

  • Reception desk opens at 9:00 am
  • Program 9:30 am - 4:30 pm 

Participation: Open to all interested scientists. Participation is free of charge. Registration is mandatory.

Lipschitz-Hall (room 1.016) Center for Mathematics Endenicher Allee 60, 53115 Bonn
Kartendaten © OpenStreetMap3

Program

Reception of participants and distribution of name badges (from 9:00 am)

Opening (9:30 - 9:40 am)

Session I (9:40 - 10:40 am) 

  • Vera Traub
    "On the Bidirected Cut Relaxation for Steiner Tree and Steiner Forest"
  • Neil Olver
    "Nonuniform Graph Partitioning Revisited"

Coffee break (10:40 - 11:15 am)

Session II (11:15 am - 12:15 pm) 

  • Daniel Dadush
    "Strongly Polynomial Frame Scaling to High Precision"
  • Thomas Kesselheim
    "Posted Prices in Combinatorial Markets with Few Samples"

Lunch break  (12:15 - 2:00 pm)

Session III (2:00 - 3:00 pm) 

  • Hannaneh Akrami
    "Epistemic EFX Allocations Exist for Monotone Valuations"
  •  Florian Brandl
    "Patience Ensures Fairness"

Coffee break II (3:00 - 3:30 pm)

Inauguaral lecture (3:30 - 4:30 pm)

  • László Végh
    "The Discrete and Continuous sides of Linear Optimization"

Conclusion and end of the event (5 minutes)


Speakers 

Traub_Vera.jpg
© Barbara Frommann / Uni Bonn

Vera Traub - Research Institute for Discrete Mathematics University Bonn

On the Bidirected Cut Relaxation for Steiner Tree and Steiner Forest

The Steiner Tree problem is one of the most prominent network design problems. It asks to connect a given set of terminals in the cheapest possible way. A promising ingredient for the design of fast and accurate approximation algorithms is the bidirected cut relaxation (BCR). We prove that this linear programming relaxation has integrality gap less than 2.

We also consider the Steiner Forest problem, an important generalization of Steiner Tree. The current best approximation factor for Steiner Forest is 2 and improving on this factor is a major open problem in the area of approximation algorithms. We describe an natural extension of BCR to Steiner Forest and prove that it has several promising properties.

This is joint work with Jarek Byrka and Fabrizio Grandoni.


Neil Olver - Department of Mathematics, LSE

Nonuniform Graph Partitioning Revisited

In the nonuniform graph partitioning problem, we are given a capacitated graph G on n vertices, and numbers n_1, n_2, ..., n_t summing to n. The goal is to partition the vertices of G into parts S_1, S_2, ..., S_t with |S_i| = n_i for each i, and minimising the capacity of edges crossing between distinct parts. This generalizes, for instance, the well-known graph bisection problem.

In order to obtain positive results, it is necessary to consider a bicriteria approximation, where we allow part sizes to be violated by a multiplicative factor r (i.e., |S_i| <= (1+r) n_i for each i). If all part sizes are equal - uniform graph partitioning - an O(log n) approximation is possible for any constant r > 0 (Feldmann and Foscini 2011, Andreev and Raecke 2008). Krauthgamer, Naor, Schwartz and Talwar (2014) showed an O(log n) approximation for the nonuniform problem for any r >= 1, but 1 is a particular barrier to their techniques. We overcome this barrier to give an an O(polylog n) approximation for any constant r > 0.

This includes joint work with Harald Raecke and Stefan Schmid.

Niel Olver_erweitert.jpg
© Neil Olver / LSE

Daniel-Dadush_zuschnitt.jpg
© Harold van de Kamp / University Utrecht

Daniel Dadush - Department of Mathematics Utrecht University

Strongly Polynomial Frame Scaling to High Precision

The frame scaling problem is: given vectors U = {u_1, ..., u_n}  in  R^d, positive marginals c in R^n, and precision epsilon > 0, find left and right scalings L in R^{d x d}, r in R^n such that (v_1,\dots,v_n) := (Lu_1 r_1,\dots,Lu_nr_n) simultaneously satisfies sum_{i=1}^n v_i v_i^T = I_d and |v_j|_2^2 = c_j, for all j in [n], up to error \epsilon. This problem has appeared in a variety of fields throughout linear algebra and computer science. In this work, we give a strongly polynomial algorithm for frame scaling with \log(1/epsilon) convergence.

This answers a question of Diakonikolas, Tzamos and Kane (STOC 2023), who gave the first strongly polynomial randomized algorithm with poly(1/epsilon) convergence for Forster transformation, the special case c = (d/n) 1_n. 
Our algorithm is deterministic, applies for general marginals c, and requires O(n^3 log(n/epsilon)) iterations as compared to the O(n^5 d^11/epsilon^5) iterations of DTK.
By lifting the framework of Linial, Samorodnitsky and Wigderson (Combinatorica 2000) for matrix scaling to the frame setting, we are able to simplify both the algorithm and analysis. 
Our main technical contribution is to generalize the potential analysis of LSW  to the frame setting and compute an update step in strongly polynomial time that achieves geometric progress in each iteration. 
In fact, we can adapt our results to give an improved analysis of strongly polynomial matrix scaling, reducing the $O(n^5 log(n/epsilon)) iteration bound of LSW to O(n^3 \log(n/epsilon)). 
Additionally, we prove a novel bound on the size of approximate frame scaling solutions, involving the condition measure \bar\chi studied in the linear programming literature, which may be of independent interest.

 This is joint work with Akshay Ramachandran.


Thomas Kesselheim - Institute of Computer Science University Bonn

Posted Prices in Combinatorial Markets with Few Samples

A ubiquitous way to allocate resources is by defining prices. Agents then choose whatever (bundle of) items they prefer given these prices. Implicitly, this way, complex combinatorial allocation problems are solved. But one also has to cope with uncertainty about buyers—for example, if they arrive at all and what preferences they have—and questions of incentives.

In this talk, we will discuss recent work on algorithms that use prices to obtain outcomes of provably good social welfare in settings with multiple items. Our particular focus will be on settings with limited prior information: While existing algorithms usually require knowledge of probability distributions of the buyers to arrive, we discuss how to learn good prices from a small number of samples from these distributions. 

Kesselheim Erweitert.jpg
© Thomas Kesselheim

Hana Akrami_zuschnitt.jpg
© Hannaneh Akrami

Hannaneh Akrami - TRA Modelling

Epistemic EFX Allocations Exist for Monotone Valuations

We study the fundamental problem of fairly dividing a set of indivisible items among agents with (general) monotone valuations. The notion of envy-freeness up to any item (EFX) is considered to be one of the most fascinating fairness concepts in this line of work. Unfortunately, despite significant efforts, existence of EFX allocations is a major open problem in fair division, thereby making the study of approximations and relaxations of EFX a natural line of research. Recently, Caragiannis et al. introduced a promising relaxation of EFX, called epistemic EFX (EEFX). We say an allocation to be EEFX if, for every agent, it is possible to shuffle the items in the remaining bundles so that she becomes "EFX-satisfied". Caragiannis et al. prove existence and polynomial-time computability of EEFX allocations for additive valuations. A natural question asks what happens when we consider valuations more general than additive?

We address this question and answer it affirmatively by establishing the existence of EEFX allocations for an arbitrary number of agents with general monotone valuations. To the best of our knowledge, beside EF1, EEFX is the only known relaxation of EFX to have such strong existential guarantees. Furthermore, we complement our existential result by proving computational and information-theoretic lower bounds. We prove that even for an arbitrary number of (more than one) agents with identical submodular valuations, it is PLS-hard to compute EEFX allocations and it requires exponentially-many value queries to do so. This is joint work with Nidhi Rathi.


Florian Brandl - Institute of Microeconomics and Hausdorff Center for Mathematics

Patience Ensures Fairness

We revisit the problem of fairly allocating a sequence of time slots when agents may have different levels of patience (Mackenzie and Komornik, 2023). For each number of agents, we provide a lower threshold and an upper threshold on the level of patience such that (i) if each agent is at least as patient as the lower threshold, then there is a proportional allocation, and (ii) if each agent is at least as patient as the upper threshold and moreover has weak preference for earlier time slots, then there is an envy-free allocation. In both cases, the proof is constructive

Florian_Brandl-zuschnitt.jpg
© Gregor Hübl / Uni Bonn

Vegh Laszlo Ausschnitt.jpg
© Voker Lannert

László Végh - Hertz Chair at TRA  Modelling

Inauguration lecture: The Discrete and Continuous sides of Linear Optimization 

Linear optimization has been at the heart of optimization for more than sixty years. Besides its immense modelling capabilities and practical impact, the pursuit of more efficient linear optimization algorithms has been a driving force in the theory of optimization, due to its dual nature as a discrete and continuous problem. The talk will highlight classical and more recent developments in the theory of linear optimization, highlighting the connections to discrete mathematics, analysis, and geometry.


Contact and more information about TRA Modelling

TRA Modelling: Mathematics, Modelling and Simulation of Complex Systems

Understanding complex systems through a combination of mathematical modelling, observation methods, computer-aided simulation and a creative mind.

Contact

Dr. Daniel Minge

+49 228 73-54462

tra-modelling@uni-bonn.de

Wird geladen